God’s Heart to Prevent Judgment
In Ezekiel we read a passage that depicts Yahweh as warning his people about their impending punishment by saying, “I will pour out my wrath on you and breathe out my fiery anger against you” (Ezek 21:31a). As we find in several other texts, Yahweh is here depicted as a ferocious fire-breathing dragon—a portrait that is, significantly enough, not unlike the way sinister cosmic monsters were sometimes depicted in ANE literature (e.g., Job 41:19-21; cf., 2 Sam 22:9; Ps 18:8; Jer 5:14).
Yet, at the same time, we can discern that “something else is going on” as the Spirit breaks through to clarify what will actually take place when his “wrath” and “fiery angry” are breathed out. Referring to the king of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar, and his vicious warriors, Ezekiel recounts the Lord saying; “I will deliver you into the hands of brutal men, men skilled in destruction” (Ezek 21:31b). This alone is enough to demonstrate that the wrathful fire that Yahweh the ferocious dragon breathes out is nothing else but the destruction that “brutal men” will bring once Yahweh stops preventing them from expressing the destroying violence that is in their heart.
What makes Ezekiel’s account particularly significant is the remarkable role Ezekiel ascribes to individual choices (e.g., Ezek 18). Some argue that this speech pattern—where God is depicted as doing something that humans actually do—indicates that God controls the violence carried out by wicked humans and cosmic agents. Rather, Ezekiel consistently depicts people as having the power to condition what God does and even to thwart his plans.
As it concerns the Babylonian siege to which this passage refers, Ezekiel depicts the Lord unsuccessfully trying to prevent this judgment. At one point, we find Yahweh telling Ezekiel that he searched for someone to “stand before me in the gap … so I would not have to destroy it” (22:30). This statement reflects the truth that Yahweh only withdraws and allows destructive agents to carry out their wicked schemes as a divine judgment on people when he sees he has no other choice.
But it also reflects the truth that Yahweh was not meticulously controlling the characters involved in this narrative. How else are we to make sense of Yahweh failing to get people to intercede for the nation if he is meticulously controlling the people in question?
Of course, classical exegetes would respond by contending that Ezekiel’s depiction of God is an accommodation to the fallen limitations of the people God was working with. The trouble with this position is that it depends upon the classical philosophic view of God, not one defined by the revelation of Jesus on the cross. If we start with the revelation of God in the Christ, there is simply no reason to see this as an accommodation, for there is nothing about the revelation of God in Christ that rules out God unsuccessfully attempting to accomplish things when these things depend on the cooperation of others. To the contrary, Jesus is frequently depicted as unsuccessfully trying to get people to receive his teaching and to submit to the rule of God (e.g., Lk 18:18-24).
On a different note, this passage reflects the remarkable power and authority God has assigned to prayer. The passage presumes that, had God succeeded in finding even one person to access the power and authority he assigned to prayer, the nation might have been spared. Unfortunately, despite his sincere efforts, God found no one to “stand … in the gap” to avert this judgment. And because of this, the Lord reluctantly concluded, “I will pour out my wrath on them and consume them with my fiery anger” (Ezek 22:30-31).
Here again God is portrayed as though he personally engages in violent behavior when he judges people. Yet, Ezekiel confirms that “something else is going on” when he immediately recounts the Lord stating that he planned to bring “down on their own heads all they have done” by handing them over as “plunder to the nations” (22:31; cf., 25:7). The fiery anger that consumes people is simply the violence of people recoiling back on them (Ps 7:16) as God withdraws and allows other violent-prone nations to vanquish them. And in this instance, the grief he experienced when he finally concluded he needed to do this is evident from the fact that he had tried beforehand to prevent it by raising up an intercessor to stand in the gap.
Photo credit: dnak via Visualhunt.com / CC BY
The Christocentric Movement Thanks largely to the work of Karl Barth, we have over the last half-century witnessed an increasing number of theologians advocating some form of a Christ-centered (or, to use a fancier theological term, a “Christocentric”) theology. Never has this Christocentric clamor a been louder than right now. There are a plethora of…
If our thinking about God is to be faithful to the New Testament, then all of our thinking about God must, from beginning to end, be centered on Christ. I’m persuaded that even our thinking about God in his transcendent, eternal state should begin and proceed with the Pauline conviction that we know nothing “except…
Here’s an exercise that has helped me experience God’s closeness and helped me feel “at home” regardless of my circumstances. It involves using the incredible gift of your physical body to help you remember God’s ever-present love and care for you. Think for a moment about the way God designed the world and the laws…
Greg looks at a violent Old Testament story through a Cruciform lens. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0447.mp3
Greg considers whether Cruciform Hermeneutics is just a complicated way of seeing what I want to see in the text, and offers nuanced thought for our more complicated hermeneutical challenges. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0307.mp3
Paul instructs us in what it means to follow Jesus, when he stated, “Follow God’s example, therefore, as dearly loved children and walk in the way of love, just as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God (Eph 5:1-2). Here Paul defines what it means to…