We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.
Re-Thinking Predestination
In Ephesians, we read that God predestined that there would be a church. It reads:
“In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, in order that we, who were the first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory” (Eph 1:11-12).
Some have argued that if God did not predestine specific people to accept his invitation for salvation, then God could not be certain that his plan would be accomplished. They argue that God’s goal for world history could fail and that Satan could win after all. There are two points to consider.
First, while humans have free will, God still set the parameters for human freedom. God knows humans exhaustively, which means that he knows all of humanity infinitely better than we could ever know. With enough information about a group of people, advertisers and insurance companies, for instance, can accurately predict the behavior of large groups of people under certain conditions. However, they cannot predict the behavior of any particular individual. If this is the case, how much more should we assume that God is able to predict the behavior of a large group of people over a long period of time?
With God’s infinite knowledge of humanity, he knew from the begin that human rebellion was a possibility, even inevitable. The Lord knew that if a fall were to occur, a certain percentage of people might reject his offer of salvation. But the Lord also foreknew that a certain percentage range of people would accept it. God was able to do this without predetermining which individuals would and would not belong to the church. This could not be known as a reality until the agents themselves respond to the offer of salvation.
Second, the Lord could know from the start that he would have a church on the basis of his perfect knowledge of his own character and ability. Even if it were possible for entire generations to rebel in totality, the Lord knew before he began the plan that he was willing to do whatever it took and to work for however long it might take to see his creation bear the fruit he was seeking.
We see this throughout Scripture. The flood story (Gen 6), after the exodus from Egypt, with Israel as king after king rebelled leading to exile, and many other cases. God refused to give up. He was not going to abandon his plan of having a people who share in his triune love and administrate his loving lordship on the earth.
Therefore, God can “predestine” by having complete assurance that his overall goals will be accomplished, even while being uncertain as to who will and will not submit to these goals. God is determined—he has predestined—that there will be a church, and he will not give up until this goal is achieved.
—Adapted from Satan and the Problem of Evil, pages 155-158
Category: General
Tags: Predestination
Related Reading
Response to the September 11th attacks
Was God Punishing Us? Since the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11th, many people have asked the question, “Why did God allow this to happen?” In response, some Christian leaders have suggested that God was punishing our country for reaching an all-time low in moral behavior. As one well-known…
Rethinking Election: Romans 9, Part 1
Many people believe that Romans 9 demonstrates that God has the right and power to save whichever individuals he wants to save and damn whichever individuals he wants to damn. I’ll call this the “deterministic” reading of Romans 9, for it holds that God determines who will be saved and who will be lost. On…
How do you respond to 1 Peter 1:1–2?
As I read it, I Pet 1:2 is the thematic statement for the whole chapter. As I will show in a moment, the rest of the chapter unpacks this statement, so the rest of the chapter should be used to interpret this statement. In the rest of the chapter we find that believers… * have…
A Cross-Centered Evaluation of Responses to Tragedy
I’d like to pick up where I left off on my previous post about Draper’s article entitled “Aurora shooting inspires various perspectives on God and belief.” Toward the end of his article, Draper reports on an informal survey conducted by Stephen Prothero on his CNN Blog. Prothero simply asks people to respond to the question: “Where…
What is the difference between “libertarian” and “compatibilistic” freedom?
Question: I often hear philosophers and theologians talk about “libertarian” and “compatibilistic” freedom. What do these terms mean? Answer: A person who holds to “libertarian” freedom believes that an agent (human or angelic) is truly free and morally responsible for their choices only if it resides in an agent’s power to determine his or her own choices. Their…
How do you respond to Romans 9?
The Deterministic Interpretation of Romans 9 Many people believe that Romans 9 demonstrates that God has the right and power to save whichever individuals he wants to save and damn whichever individuals he wants to damn. I’ll call this the “deterministic” reading of Romans 9, for it holds that God determines who will be saved…