We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.

What is the significance of Acts 27:10-44?
This is the passage deal with Paul’s ill-fated voyage to Italy as a prisoner. The ship ran into very bad weather and Paul announced, “Men, I can see that our voyage is going to be disastrous and bring great loss to ship and cargo, and to our own lives also” (vs. 10). As he reminded them later on, he was trying to get the sailors to stop sailing (vs. 21).
Unfortunately, the sailors didn’t listen (vs. 11). Why would they? They’re seasoned sailors and Paul’s a missionary prisoner. But several days later their ship encountered a hurricane force wind (called “the Northeaster”, vs. 14) which eventually caused the seasoned sailors to abandon any hope of survival ( vs 20). But an angel of the Lord appeared to Paul and told him that God was mercifully going to protect him and everyone else on the ship (vs. 24). Paul told the men they should have listened to him (vs. 21), but now that they found themselves in this mess, he told them to have faith in God and remain courageous (vs. 22). They’d lose the boat, but all on board would be saved.
When it looked like the ship might run aground, some sailors tried to escape on a lifeboat (29-30). Interestingly enough, Paul then told the captain, “Unless these men stay with the ship, you cannot be saved” (vs. 31). The ship eventually crashes, and some of the soldiers planned on killing the prisoners to prevent them from escaping (vs. 42). But the captain, now very impressed with Paul, wanted him spared so he did not allow the soldiers to kill him (vs. 43). In this way “everyone reached land safely” (vs. 44).
It’s important to notice all the contingencies involved in this story. Unless we suppose that Paul had better sailing skills than the seasoned sailors, it seems it was by divine inspiration that Paul announced that the voyage would be disastrous if they kept sailing (vs. 10). So he tried to get them to stop. It seems like it was God’s will that they stop when Paul told them to, and Paul himself chastises them for not listening to him (vs. 21). Once they found themselves in trouble, however, God sent an angel to reassure them they were going to be safe. Yet, even this promise was conditioned on whether or not all the men would have faith, stay courageous, and not abandon the ship (vs. 29-31). A straightforward reading of the passage suggests that, had the sailors not stayed with the ship, the promise of the angel would have been revoked and lives would have been lost.
So, while it seems it was a pre-settled certainty that Paul would sooner or later stand trial before Caesar (vs. 24), the passage indicates that there were a number of variables which affected when and how Paul would end up there, as well as who would or would not survive the trip with him. The passage, in other words, suggests that the future is partly settled, but also partly open.
Category: Q&A
Tags: Open Theism, Q&A
Topics: Open Theism
Verse: Acts 27
Related Reading

Non-Violence and Police Protection
Scott Davidson via Compfight Question: I am a President of a State University. As a frequent podcaster of your sermons and reader of your books, I’m seeking your advice on a matter. Because our campus is some distance from the police headquarters in our city, many within the State University are arguing that we should…

How do you respond to Isaiah 46:9–11?
The Lord says, “I am God, and there is none other; I am God, and there is no one like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying ‘My purpose shall stand, and I will fulfill my intention.’” To distinguish himself from the dead idols Israel was…

How People Misunderstand Open Theism
Open theism holds that, because agents are free, the future includes possibilities (what agents may and may not choose to do). Since God’s knowledge is perfect, open theists hold that God knows the future partly as a realm of possibilities. This view contrasts with classical theism that has usually held that God knows the future exclusively as a domain…

How do you respond to Romans 11:36?
“For from him [God] and through him and to him are all things.” Calvinists sometimes cite this doxology as evidence that Paul believed that every single event in world history was from, through and for God. In light of the fact that the verses leading up to this doxology address God’s genuine frustration with Israel’s…

Molinism and Open Theism – Part II
In the previous post on this topic I briefly outlined Molinism and then discussed “the grounding objection.” In this post I’ll first discuss another fundamental objection to Molinism and then discuss how it is overcome by the Open View of the Future. In the process it will be clear how the Open View differs from…

In your Anabaptist view, should Christians get involved in politics at all? Do you think they should even vote?
Ultimately, each person must follow their conscience when it comes to whether or not they vote, how they vote if they decide to vote, and the extent to which they should involve themselves in the political system. But we must always remain aware of the dangers involved in participating in the political system, for it…