What is the significance of Acts 27:10-44?

This is the passage deal with Paul’s ill-fated voyage to Italy as a prisoner. The ship ran into very bad weather and Paul announced, “Men, I can see that our voyage is going to be disastrous and bring great loss to ship and cargo, and to our own lives also” (vs. 10). As he reminded them later on, he was trying to get the sailors to stop sailing (vs. 21).

Unfortunately, the sailors didn’t listen (vs. 11). Why would they? They’re seasoned sailors and Paul’s a missionary prisoner. But several days later their ship encountered a hurricane force wind (called “the Northeaster”, vs. 14) which eventually caused the seasoned sailors to abandon any hope of survival ( vs 20). But an angel of the Lord appeared to Paul and told him that God was mercifully going to protect him and everyone else on the ship (vs. 24). Paul told the men they should have listened to him (vs. 21), but now that they found themselves in this mess, he told them to have faith in God and remain courageous (vs. 22). They’d lose the boat, but all on board would be saved.

When it looked like the ship might run aground, some sailors tried to escape on a lifeboat (29-30). Interestingly enough, Paul then told the captain, “Unless these men stay with the ship, you cannot be saved” (vs. 31). The ship eventually crashes, and some of the soldiers planned on killing the prisoners to prevent them from escaping (vs. 42). But the captain, now very impressed with Paul, wanted him spared so he did not allow the soldiers to kill him (vs. 43). In this way “everyone reached land safely” (vs. 44).

It’s important to notice all the contingencies involved in this story. Unless we suppose that Paul had better sailing skills than the seasoned sailors, it seems it was by divine inspiration that Paul announced that the voyage would be disastrous if they kept sailing (vs. 10). So he tried to get them to stop. It seems like it was God’s will that they stop when Paul told them to, and Paul himself chastises them for not listening to him (vs. 21). Once they found themselves in trouble, however, God sent an angel to reassure them they were going to be safe. Yet, even this promise was conditioned on whether or not all the men would have faith, stay courageous, and not abandon the ship (vs. 29-31). A straightforward reading of the passage suggests that, had the sailors not stayed with the ship, the promise of the angel would have been revoked and lives would have been lost.

So, while it seems it was a pre-settled certainty that Paul would sooner or later stand trial before Caesar (vs. 24), the passage indicates that there were a number of variables which affected when and how Paul would end up there, as well as who would or would not survive the trip with him. The passage, in other words, suggests that the future is partly settled, but also partly open.

Category:
Tags: ,
Topics:
Verse:

Related Reading

Greg on the Open View: Video One

By popular demand, we’re sharing the first of Greg’s video presentations on the Open View of the future. If you enjoy it, you can find the rest of the series entitled A Flexible Sovereignty: A Biblical Understanding of Providence and the Nature of the Future by clicking here. This video was recorded in 2008 at Azuza…

Five Brief Philosophical Arguments for the Open View

Introduction I believe that sound philosophical arguments support the open view in which God doesn’t foreknow the future free decisions of humans. My main reasons for holding this view are biblical and theological, but since truth is one we should expect that the truths of Scripture and the truths of reason will arrive at the…

How do you respond to 1 Timothy 4:1–3?

“…in the later times some will renounce the faith by paying attention to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the hypocrisy of liars whose consciences are seared with a hot iron. They forbid marriage and demand abstinence from foods…” New Testament authors considered themselves to be living “in the later times” (e.g. Acts 2:17;…

Why did God create me to be a pedophile?

Question: Since the first time I experienced a sex drive it’s been directed towards little children. I’ve never acted on this, for I know it’s wrong. But it torments me. Why would God created me with pedophile cravings? Answer: I’m so sorry for your condition and greatly respect the fact that you have committed yourself…

What If Open Theism is Not True? What Would Be the Practical Implications?

In this episode Greg talks about what the practical implication would be if Open Theism is not true. Our favorite quote from this episode: “There is no way to live as if we are predestined.” http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0010.mp3

What about the Gospel of John and Calvinism?

Question: The Gospel of John seems to teach that people believe because God draws them, rather than that God draws people because they believe. If this is true, how can you deny the Calvinistic teaching that salvation is based on God’s choice, not ours? Answer: As you note, many people find support for the view…

Topics: