We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.
When the Last Few Moments Changes Everything
One of the central things ReKnew wants to accomplish is to challenge followers of Jesus to accept that the self-sacrificial love Jesus revealed on the cross is the definitive, and even the exhaustive, revelation of God’s character. Everything about God, we believe, should be understood through the lens of the cross.
For most Christians, Jesus is part of their mental image of God, but not all of it. They rather have an amalgamated mental portrait of God in which the revelation of God in Christ is fused with a variety of violent and/or nationalistic portraits in the Old Testament. As I noted in my previous post on this topic, the reason for this is that Christians are typically taught that if the whole Bible is the inspired Word of God (which I agree with), then everything in it, including its various portraits of God, must be equally authoritative (which I disagree with).
The assumption that everything in Scripture is equally authoritative inclines Christians, especially Christians from more conservative churches, to read it along the lines of a cookbook. Like a recipe, the meaning and authority of a passage isn’t much affected by where it’s located within the overall book. The truth, however, is that the Bible is not at all like a cookbook. It’s a story, along the lines of a novel. And it’s a story with a very surprising twist in it.
Have you seen “The Sixth Sense,” staring Bruce Willis, or “The Book of Eli,” starring Denzel Washington? Spoiler Alert! I won’t give away the ending, but I’ll just say that the last minutes of both shows completely reframe the movie. You have to rethink every single thing that took place in light of last few moments of the movie. This is quite a bit like the kind of story the Bible tells.
The whole Old Testament leads up to, and is fulfilled in, Jesus the Messiah. But the particular way Jesus fulfills it reframes everything. Hardly anyone saw this coming! In fact, the way Jesus completes the story of God’s dealings with Israel was so unexpected, most who were looking for the Messiah couldn’t accept him once he came.
For example, most Jews were looking for a Messiah who would reinforce Israel’s status as God’s favored nation by leading a revolt against its oppressors (the Romans) and reinstating it as a sovereign nation. Jesus instead turned Jewish religious nationalism on its head by proclaiming a kingdom in which many “outsiders” (Gentiles and sinners) would become “insiders” while many who assumed they were “insiders” would find themselves on the outside. And far from leading a revolt, Jesus commanded people to love their enemies (e.g. the Romans) and to therefore refrain from all violence, choosing instead to do good to their enemies, bless their enemies, serve their enemies, and to turn the other cheek when struck.
In fact, not only does Jesus not lead people in a military conquest over their enemies, he allows himself to be executed on a cross to reveal God’s profound love for enemies! And in this scandalous and unexpected action, his followers discerned the ultimate revelation of God’s true nature. With his life, ministry, teaching, and especially his sacrificial death, Jesus provided a picture of God and his kingdom that forces us to reframe everything that led up to him.
Over the next several posts I will argue that this means that we shouldn’t place the revelation of God in Jesus alongside of the portraits of God in the Old Testament. Rather, we’ll only begin to see how Jesus reframes the storyline of God’s dealings with Israel if we place his revelation over all previous revelations and if we then interpret all previous revelations through the lens of this one. In fact, we’re going to see that this is precisely what Jesus and the authors of the New Testament instruct us to do. As much as they affirm the inspiration of the Old Testament, they are even more emphatic in proclaiming that the revelation of God in Christ completes, and in this sense trumps, everything that preceded him.
Image by seier+seier. Sourced via Flickr.
Category: General
Tags: Bible, Cruciform Theology, Jesus, Picture of God, ReKnew
Related Reading
Loving a Twilight Zone God?
David D. Flowers posted this insightful reflection over on his blog about an episode of The Twilight Zone and what it says about some pop views of God. Can we really love a God that exercises this kind of random control just because he can? We can certainly fear a God like this, but can…
The Incarnation: More Than a Rescue Mission
A mistake people often make concerning the Incarnation is that they fail to distinguish the eternal plan of God to unite himself with humanity in Christ, on the one hand, from the atoning significance this plan acquired after the fall, on the other. Some therefore think of the Incarnation as a sort of “Plan B”…
God in Our Image
zen Sutherland via Compfight We came across this piece written by Jonathan Storment earlier this month and we had to share it here. The title of the piece is Everyday Idolatry: My God. He does a great job of outlining the ways that we twist God into whatever we need him to be to prop up…
Four Principles of the Cruciform Thesis
In the second volume of Crucifixion of the Warrior God, I introduce how four dimensions of the revelation of God on the cross (as introduced in this post) lead to four principles that show us how to unlock aspects of the OT’s violent divine portraits and thus disclose how a given portrait bears witness to…
Biblical Versus Magical Faith: Reflections on the ReKnew Manifesto
The second core conviction of the “ReKnew Manifesto” is that we believe it is time for the Church to re-think common assumptions about faith. Faith is at the heart of what it means to follow Jesus and to live under the reign of God. Yet Christians rarely seriously reflect on what it means to “have…
When Jesus Referred to Canaanites as “Dogs”
Last week I discussed Paul’s harsh language regarding his opponents, the worst example being his reference to certain opponents as “dogs” (Phil 3:2). I suggested that such language simply reflects the fact that Paul wasn’t perfect, as he himself admitted. Several people pushed back on this suggestion by pointing out that Jesus once referred to…