A Response to Tony Campolo on Fighting the Powers: Some Final Thoughts
In my previous post I argued against Tony’s claim that God expects governments to carry out his will and that Christians are therefore to influence government to carry out this task. I rather argued that, given that governments are premised on human rebellion and are under the oppressive, deceptive and corrupting influence of Satan, we should never expect or rely on government to care for people. We who follow Jesus should rather assume responsibility for the needy and focus all our resources on carrying out this task. For my final response to Tony’s views, I’d like to address an argument Tony uses to support his claim. It is based on the final judgment scene in Matthew 25. Tony says:
In Matthew 25:31–46, we read that God will judge the nations in accord with how each nation cared for the poor, cared for those in prison, and how well they accepted aliens. Please note that God holds nations, not just the church, responsible for caring for the poor. That passage of Scripture should answer those who question whether or not there is a national responsibility to care for those who are needy.
I am not going to dispute that nations have a responsibility to care for those who are needy. All humans have a responsibility to do this, and so of course all humans in government as well as in any other role have a responsibility to do this. But there are two things that I believe are misguided about this argument.
First, the term translated “nations” (ethnos) simply means “people group” or “multitude.” Jesus’ point in saying that “all nations will be gathered” (vs.32) is not to distinguish “nations” from individuals, but to simply express the truth that all individuals from all the world’s different people groups will be brought together on the judgment day. This is why, when the judgment is carried out, it is carried out entirely on individuals. The “son of man” will “separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats” (vs. 32). It is individuals, not nations or governments, who are said to have fed Jesus when he was hungry, visited him when he was in prison, etc. (vs. 44-36). And it is individuals, not nations or governments, who are either blessed with “eternal life” or consigned to “eternal punishment” (vs. 46). There is, therefore, absolutely nothing in this passage that addresses how Christians should view governments.
Second, I think it’s particularly misguided to use this passage to encourage Christians to try to get governments to take care of the needy. Yes, governments should do this, and so long as their conscience allows them, Christians can use whatever influence they have to encourage or help governments to do this. Indeed, so long as they’re careful, I see nothing wrong with churches even partnering with governments to serve people. (My church is presently partnering with several dozen organizations to this very end). But as I said in my previous post, given that government is only necessary because of sin, and given that government is under the corrupting influence of Satan, kingdom people should not rely on government to meet people’s needs, and our focus shouldn’t be on trying to get government to better meet people’s needs. I rather contend that all followers of Jesus should assume that it is the job of the church to do this. As the body of Christ, our call is to do exactly what Jesus did in his “first” body. He cared for, and ultimately sacrificed himself for, all who were in need. And so our job is to care for, and sacrifice ourselves for, all who are in need.
Indeed, the distinctive way the body of Christ is willing to sacrifice our time, energy and money to serve others, including those who consider themselves our enemies, is how we are to demonstrate the reality of our king and of his kingdom to the world. We are called to be a community of people who contrast with the world precisely because of our loving, Christ-like service to others.
Sadly, the church in America is not doing this well. Even sadder, however, is that instead of pouring all our energy into getting the church to fulfill her calling, many leaders today are pouring themselves into rallying Christians to get government to fulfill what they believe government’s call is. Not only this, but since Christians are as divided as the general populace about the best way for governments to serve people, this focus on politics invariably invites the divisiveness of the political realm into the church. And this only further incapacitates the body of Christ and keeps her from fulfilling her calling.
Paul writes: “What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside” (2 Cor. 5:12-13). We can probably agree that government is not doing all it’s supposed to do. In light of what I shared in the previous post, this shouldn’t at all surprise us. But what must concern us deeply is that we are not fulfilling our calling. God will someday judge all who are in government, as he will all others. But it’s not our job as kingdom people to judge them. This we are to leave entirely up to God. Our judgment should rather be focused on ourselves. And so all of our time, energy and resources must be spent on becoming the Church our Lord calls us to be.
As I’ve shared in my previous two posts, I have the utmost respect for my friend and brother Tony Campolo. I know God has used him in powerful ways for decades and that he continues to uses him. And I love the passion with which he calls on Christians to be agents of change in society. I just wish he focused all that passion and talent on rallying Christians to be agents of change by being the church rather than by influencing government.
Ronn aka “Blue” Aldaman via Compfight In case you think the last post was a veiled endorsement for Obama, here’s an article arguing that Mitt Romney is the candidate to vote for if you really care for the poor. Again, there are many schools of thought and it’s overly simplistic to think that voting for…
José Manuel Ríos Valiente via Compfight. As an illustration of the ambiguity of the abortion question when approaching it from a political point of view, here’s an article portraying Obama as a hero of the pro-life movement. Our purpose for posting this isn’t to suggest that all of us should vote for Obama in light of…
Question. At a recent conference I heard you argue against the idea that there could ever be a distinctly “Christian” political position by contending that political disputes are premised on a claim to superiority while discipleship is fundamentally rooted in humility. I don’t think I get what you mean. Can you explain this? Answer: In…
A number of years ago I attended a basketball game at a Christian school. Just before the game everyone was asked to stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance. So I stood, placed my hand over my heart, and began to recite our national creed. Halfway through, however, I began to wonder what I was…
“…citizens of the kingdom of God need to take care to distinguish between their core faith and values on the one hand and the particular way they politically express their faith and values on the other.”
Image by fusion-of-horizons via Flickr Some people insist that the only reason that neither Jesus nor anyone else in the first several centuries of the church tried to dominate the political system of their day was because they were a small minority of people living in a nondemocratic and hostile environment. By contrast, the argument goes,…