The Image of Cross-Like Love: God’s Self-Portrait, Part 6
In the previous blog I argued that God is cross-like love. In this blog I’d like to take this a step further by demonstrating why the cross alone could function as the definitive revelation of God’s true character and by showing how this revelation weaves together everything Jesus was about.
If you want to know the quality of someone’s love for you, measure the depth of their sacrifice for you. Love is not an inner disposition that has no behavioral implications. Love is expressed in action — costly action. On the cross, God went to the furthest extreme possible for us, making the greatest sacrifice possible for us. Think about it. On the cross, God not only stooped to identify with our humanity, but the all-holy God went to the extreme of stooping to become our sin (2 Cor 5:21) and the God who is perfectly united in loved stooped to become our God-forsaken curse (Gal.3:13). This means that on the cross, God went to the extreme of experiencing his own antithesis, and in doing so, he could not have gone one centimeter further than he did. And the unsurpassable extremity of God’s sacrifice for us – a race of people who could not deserve it less – reveals the unsurpassable perfection of his loving character.
Once you understand the logic inherent in God’s self-revelation on the cross, you can see why it alone can constitute the quintessential revelation of God’s self-sacrificial character. No event in all eternity could more unambiguously disclose the perfection of the other-oriented love that God is. To state it in the form of Anselm’s ontological argument, the cross is that revelation greater than which none other can be conceived.
Because the cross is the quintessential expression of the character of the God that Jesus reveals, it also is the thematic center of Jesus’ life, teachings and actions. From his incarnation to his healing and teaching ministry to his death, resurrection and ascension, Jesus was revealing the cross-like love of God. We can see this very clearly in Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also… I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. (Matt 5:38-9, 44-5).
Notice that Jesus taught that refusing to retaliate and choosing to instead love and bless our enemies was the precondition for being considered a child of the Father. And the reason is that children of the heavenly Father must reflect his character. The cross reveals that God doesn’t return force for force but instead gives his life out of love for enemies. Therefore, his children must refuse to return force with force and chose instead to love and sacrifice for their enemies. The Apostle Paul made the same point when he said, “Imitate God. Live in love as Christ loved you and gave his life for you” (Eph 5:1-2).
God is not one who says, “Do what I say, not what I do.” If he commands us to refrain from violence and instead love enemies, it’s because his own loving nature leads him to refrain from violence and instead love enemies (the OT violent portraits of God notwithstanding). And this is precisely what the cross reveals about God. God’s children are called to non-violent, enemy-serving, self-sacrificial love because this love alone conforms to the true character of the God who is revealed on the cross.
Everyone eventually imitates the kind of God they envision. So, if we hope to grow into the kind of people who imitate God’s love, revealed on the cross, we must commit to basing our mental picture of God on the cross, which alone is the perfect revelation of God’s true character. To the degree that we embrace less beautiful pictures of God, our lives will fall short of the beauty of self-sacrificial love that Christ calls us to.
“The economic Trinity is the immanent Trinity, and the immanent Trinity is the economic Trinity.” This is the maxim introduced by the Catholic theologian Karl Rahner that should shape our discussion of the Trinity. It is simply a short-hand way of saying that since the way God is toward us in Christ truly reveals God,…
Going back to pre-Socratic philosophers and running through the major strands of the church’s theological tradition, the conception of how God (or, in ancient Greece, “the One”) was arrived at primarily by negating the contingent features of the world that were deemed inferior and in need of explanation. God transcended the world, for example, by…
Greg considers the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and speculates on the nature of the angels who were sent there. Episode 597 http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0597.mp3
These things need to stop as it relates to our faith and our politics. Image by Katie Tegtmeyer. Sourced via Flickr.
During the twentieth century the development of a Christocentric reading of the Scriptures—which is crucial to understanding what I argue in Crucifixion of the Warrior God—surged in the wake of Karl Barth’s publication of his Romans commentary in 1916. It was justifiably described as a “bombshell” that fell “on the playground of the theologians,” demolishing…
The warfare worldview is based on the conviction that our world is engaged in a cosmic war between a myriad of agents, both human and angelic, that have aligned themselves with either God or Satan. We believe this worldview best reflects the response to evil depicted throughout the Bible. For example, Jesus unequivocally opposed evils…