We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded by your direct support for ReKnew and our vision. Please consider supporting this project.
Trying to Acquire What You Already Have
Image by Joshua Earle
The lies Satan told to Eve in the garden made eating from the forbidden tree (the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) look desirable. On the one hand, the lies caused her to question God’s trustworthiness. And correspondingly, on the other hand, they also caused her to question whether it is enough to simply live in union with God, creating a perceived internal vacuum. The tree provided Eve with a perceived solution to her emptiness, one that didn’t involve depending upon God, whom she now deemed as being untrustworthy.
There was something she could do about the hunger within, the vacuum.
Just like Eve, we believe we can fill our emptiness by doing something and acquiring things. We believe we can give ourselves fulfilling worth apart from God by performing. We believe we can become self-sufficient through our efforts. We believe we can fix ourselves as well as other people. All of this is to say, we believe we can and should become wise, like God, knowing good and evil.
In the temptation story of Genesis 3, the serpent didn’t promise Eve something she didn’t already have. The serpent promised Eve that should could be “like God.” Yet she and Adam were already made in the very image and likeness of God (Gen 1:26-27). The craftiness of the serpent is found in his cunning ability to make Eve think she had to become what she in fact already was.
How else could he tempt a person who already had all she would ever need? The serpent convinced Eve that her life had to be found in doing rather than simply being. He convinced her to break fellowship with God in order to possess the very thing God has already given her for free: her being in the “image and likeness of God.”
Had Eve remained in union with God, had she rejected the Accuser’s lie about God, the serpents’ promise that she could become like God would have been utterly vacuous. She would have remained in the peace of knowing that she already reflected God’s image and was full because of the unsurpassable worth God continually poured into her.
Had Adam and Eve resisted the serpent’s lie about God, and therefore about themselves, the forbidden tree would have remained a helpful “No Trespassing” sign placed in the garden by a God who had their best interest in mind. It would have been a boundary that freed them to focus on the one thing God called them to do: love as God is love.
However, when they believed the lie about God and self, they began to see the world through their own eyes, separate from God. Now things started to appear good and evil. God was “evil,” they became empty and eating of the tree became “good.”
The moment they ate the fruit, they ceased being the wonderful, God-centered, God-dependent human beings the Creator intended them to be and became empty human doings—perpetually trying to acquire what they already had been given.
The human race now lives life illegitimately trying to become what God has already made us to be. The world has become a stage upon which we perpetually assess things and people as good or evil, depending on how we think they can or can’t fill the vacuum in our hearts. We thus use everything and everyone in the world as surrogate gods, trying to get from people, deeds, and things what only God can give—what Go has already given—freely.
—Adapted from Repenting of Religion, pages 146-148
Tags: Adam and Eve, Character of God, Contentment, Judgment, Lies
Topics: Following Jesus
Christus Victor Atonement and Girard’s Scapegoat Theory
Many of the major criticisms of Crucifixion of the Warrior God that have been raised since it was published four weeks ago have come from folks who advocate Rene Girard’s understanding of the atonement. A major place where these matters are being discussed is here, and you are free to join. Now, I have to…
Why Are We So Mired in Violence?
In his marvelous little book entitled The Great Divorce, C. S. Lewis envisioned hell as a realm in which people are forever moving farther away from one another. Hell is the ultimate, cosmic, suburban sprawl! It seems to me that Western civilization is diving headlong into Lewis’ hell, and we’re being pulled there by the…
Does the Lord “Devastate” the Earth?
There is this passage that has sometimes been labeled “Isaiah’s Little Apocalypse” that proclaims how the Lord will “lay waste,” “destroy,” and “ruin” the earth. (The following builds on this previous post which identifies a dual speech pattern of God). It begins with: The LORD is going to lay waste the earth and devastate…
Thankful for the Passion of God
The classical view of God has held that God is impassible, meaning he is above pathos (passion or emotions). The main reason the church came to this view was that, following the Hellenistic philosophical tradition, they associated emotions with change while believing God was above all change (immutable). Moreover, experiencing emotions implies that one is affected by…
How Judging Blocks Love
What keeps us from fulfilling the law of love that is exemplified by Jesus and laid out in the Scriptures (Matt. 22:39-40; Rom 13:8,10 Gal 5:14)? In a word, we like to pass verdicts. To some extent, we get our sense of worth from attaching worth or detracting worth from others, based on what we…
Sermon Clip: That, Not How
The Genesis 1 creation story has always left people with questions. The main one being: Is Genesis 1 a literal story of how God created our universe? In this sermon clip, Greg Boyd talks about how when he was young, he wrestled with this question as a Christian. In the full sermon, Greg presents three…