We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.
Defining Love
If God’s eternal essence is love, as discussed in this post, then we must ask: What does this confession actually mean? We must explore this question carefully because “love” has been defined in many theological streams in ways that seem contradictory to the kind of love revealed by Christ.
As with so many other things, the dominant way that love has been defined has been shaped in large part by St. Augustine. Along with all other theologians up to his time, Augustine affirmed that the revelation that “God is love” lies at heart of the Gospel and is foundational for Christian theology and ethics. Moreover, Augustine held that all Scripture should be interpreted with “the rule of love.” Unfortunately, Augustine defined “love” as an inner attitude and orientation that had no necessary implications for one’s actual behavior. Speaking of Jesus’ command to never retaliate but to rather “turn the other cheek” for example, Augustine argued, “What is here required is not a bodily action, but an inward disposition.” Augustine thus argued that one could love one’s enemy while nevertheless treating them with “benevolent severity.” More specifically, for God as well as humans, loving enemies did not necessarily rule out torturing and killing them if one was justified in doing so.
However one assesses Augustine’s motivations for arriving at this subjective-oriented definition of love, the fact that it was compatible with “just war” thinking made it immediately popular with Church leaders who were struggling to come to terms with Jesus’ teaching on love in light of the political power they had recently inherited as a result of the Constantinian revolution. Indeed, with this remarkable redefinition of love in hand, Augustine could cite Luke 14:23, in which the master in Jesus’ parable tells his servant to go out into the streets and “compel” people to come to his banquet, to support the use of coercive force in the name of love to “compel” unbelievers and heretics to repent. This set a tragic precedent that contributed to the torturing and execution of millions at the hands of professing Christians throughout history.
The same Augustinian-type reasoning that led Christians to believe that torturing and killing people was compatible with loving them contributed to theologians and others having little problem confessing that “God is love” while accepting that God could command genocide. That is, since many (but not all) Christians in Augustine’s time were taking the violent depictions of Yahweh in the OT at face value and ascribing to these depictions the same revelatory authority they ascribed to Jesus, it followed that Jesus’ revelation of God’s love must somehow be compatible with engaging in and sanctioning horrific violence. And if God’s love does not necessarily rule out violence for him, there’s no reason to think it necessarily rules out violence for us.
In any event, whether the reasoning moved from a redefinition of love to its compatibility with violence or from the acceptance of violence to its compatibility with love, the compatibility of the two under certain “justified” conditions has been generally assumed since the time of Augustine.
In contrast to Augustine, the Bible does not allow us to speculate about love in this way. If we want to define the kind of love that God is we must notice that the NT is not silent about this topic. Rather than giving us an abstract definition, however, the apostle John points us to a person and to an action: “This is how we know what love is,” John says, “Jesus Christ laid down his life for us.” From this he concludes, “we ought to lay down our lives for one another“ (1 Jn 3:16).
When John proclaims that, “God is love,” this is the kind of love he is referring to. He’s saying that God is the kind of love that causes God to set aside his blessed state, to humble himself by becoming a human being, to offer himself up to be humiliated, tortured and crucified and to bear our sin and guilt, all while we were yet sinners and enemies of God! The infinite intensity and unsurpassable perfection of the eternal love that unites the Father, Son and Spirit is most profoundly revealed in God’s willingness to go to the furthest extreme possible to save us, as the all-holy God stooped to become our sin and our God-forsaken curse, which is the very antithesis of himself (2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 3:13).
This, and only this, defines the love that God is.
Image by Nina Strehl via Unsplash
Category: Essays
Tags: Augustine, God is Love, God's Character, Jesus, Non-Violence, Religious Violence
Topics: Attributes and Character
Related Reading
A Brief Theology of God’s Love
The most profound truth of the Bible is that “God is love” (1 John 4:8, 16). This is the most fundamental thing to be said about God, for it encompasses everything else that can be said about God. Peter Kreft explains this passage it this way: Love is God’s essence. Nowhere else does Scripture express…
What Can We Do About Gun Violence? The Rex Harsin Interview (podcast)
Dan talks with Rex Harsin about his new documentary called “Beating Guns,” made with Shane Claiborne and Michael Martin of RAWTools. What does it mean to believe in and follow a non-violent savior while wielding a gun? Can a Christian be a peacemaker while being licensed to carry? What does it mean to be a follower…
A Police Officer Questions Pacifism
Police Officer: My theology totally lines up with your theology, except in one area: namely, your pacifism. I am a police officer, and it frankly seems obvious to me that there are times when it is proper, if not godly, to use whatever level of force is necessary to stop an aggressor from harming loved ones…
Who Killed Ananias and Sapphira? A Response to Paul Copan (#6)
In his critique of Crucifixion of the Warrior God (CWG), Paul Copan makes a concerted effort to argue that the God revealed in Jesus Christ and witnessed to throughout the NT is not altogether non-violent. One of the passages Copan cites against me is the famous account of Ananias and Sapphira falling down dead immediately…
What About Jesus’ Violent Parables? A Response to Paul Copan (#7)
Copan’s Argument. In Crucifixion of the Warrior God (CWG) and Cross Vision (CV) I argue that the violent depictions of God in the OT are incompatible with the non-violent, self-sacrificial, enemy-embracing God who is fully revealed in the crucified Christ. It’s my contention that we therefore need to interpret these violent divine portraits, as well…
How can you believe Matthew’s report about the Jewish cover up of the resurrection?
Question: In Matthew it’s reported that Jewish authorities tried to cover up the resurrection of Jesus by saying the disciples stole the body while the guards were sleeping. I don’t buy it. How would Matthew know about this story, since it was a secret conversation the authorities had with the guards? And how could they…