Imaging God Wrongly: God’s Self-Portrait, Part 2
Our relationship with God depends on the way we imagine God. When we get the image of God right, the doors open for us to trust and relate to God in the ways we were created to do. But there are so many images of God that are entirely messed up. Just think about the last movie you saw where God had some kind of role. How was he depicted? Whether it is the distant all-powerful figure in the clouds from Monty Python, Morgan Freeman’s character in Bruce Almighty, or the wrathful Yahweh in the recent televised series on The Story of the Bible, God is never depicted as he is revealed in Jesus.
So, how did we get to this place? How did we come to the place where it is so hard for us to actually see God for who he really is? Well, this question takes us back to the beginning.
Out of love, God placed the “tree of the knowledge of good and evil” in the Garden. It was God’s “No Trespassing” sign reminding Adam and Eve – and all of us – that we should never imagine we have the right or the capacity to judge God, others, or even ourselves by our standards of “good” and “evil.” If we’re going to love like God loves, we must always remember that God alone is the judge of the world. We can’t love and judge at the same time. (1)
As he always does, Satan took God’s loving act and gave it his own diabolic spin. He told Eve that the reason God forbid her from eating from the tree was because, “God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:5). Satan painted a petty and untrustworthy picture of God. He made it seem like God was threatened by the potential the forbidden tree offered Eve.
Tragically, Eve believed the lie. Since her picture of God was no longer trustworthy, she stopped trusting God. Consequently, she felt she was on her own to become all she could be. So she violated God’s “No Trespassing” sign and ate from the tree. And, as the proverbial saying goes, “the rest is history.”
Behind all human rebellion and sin is a faulty picture of God. At the core of our being we crave a fullness of love, worth, significance and security that only our Creator can give. We have a hunger for an ongoing experience of fullness of LIFE – what Jesus called “life to the full” (Jn 10:10, NIV), and it never goes away as long as we have a surrendered relationship to the one who is himself “the fountain of life” (Ps 36:9). (To distinguish this kind of life from mere “biological life,” I’ll capitalize LIFE when referring to the “life to the full” that only God can give). All the beautiful plans God has for humans depend on our getting LIFE (that is, our core sense of worth, significance, lovability and security) from God and God alone. Everything we are created to do is meant to be an expression of the LIFE we freely receive from God.
Our souls are wired to crave this “life to the full.” But if we embrace an untrustworthy mental picture of God, we simply cannot enter into a LIFE-giving relationship with God, and this, in turn, means we will invariably try to acquire LIFE from what we accomplish, possess, achieve, from who we think we impress (including God, which is to say, from religion), or from the pleasures we experience. The Bible calls all such attempts to acquire LIFE for ourselves “idolatry,” and it lies at the root of all sin.
You can hear all the sermons in the world about how you shouldn’t try to get LIFE from idolatrous sources, and they will do you absolutely no good unless the hunger that drives you to idolatry goes away. Which means, the only way to get free of idolatry is to get all our LIFE from God. And the only way we can do this is to embrace an accurate, trustworthy and beautiful mental picture of the God who fills us with LIFE by passionately loving us.
Everything God created us to be depends on our entertaining a mental picture of the true, trustworthy, loving God. And everything Satan wants us to be depends on his deceiving us to entertain a picture of an untrustworthy, unloving, false God. Make it your life mission to cultivate the first and root out of your mind all vestiges of the second.
(1). For more on this, see G. Boyd, Repenting of Religion (Baker, 2005).
For a sermon on this topic, this one will prove helpful.
Theologians throughout Church history have used the concept of divine accommodation to account for everything in Scripture that seemed “unworthy” of God. Whatever didn’t line up with what we know about God was seen as God accommodating his revelation to our limited and fallen framework. The trouble is, theologians have, by and large, used the…
One of the central things ReKnew wants to accomplish is to challenge followers of Jesus to accept that the self-sacrificial love Jesus revealed on the cross is the definitive, and even the exhaustive, revelation of God’s character. Everything about God, we believe, should be understood through the lens of the cross. For most Christians, Jesus…
Greg discusses the problem with speculating on HOW God interacts in the world. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0265.mp3
In my ongoing reflections on the ReKnew Manifesto, I’ve spent the last two posts (here and here) arguing that nothing is more important in our life than our mental images of God. If so, then the all-important question is: what authority do we trust to tell us what God is like? To most evangelicals, the…
One of the things that Christians typically believe in and that I’ve struggled with a great deal is the concept of faith. Like most Christians, I once assumed a person’s faith is as strong as that person is certain. And, accordingly, I assumed that doubt is the enemy of faith. That is, after all, how…
It’s long been said that Sunday morning is the most segregated time of the week. Sadly, many have taught us that homogeneity is the way the church grows the fastest. But should we put up with this? In what follows, Greg lays out a biblical foundation for what he calls “reversing Babel.” According to the…