We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.

Evangelism or Social Action: What’s the Priority?
Throughout the last century Evangelicals were known much more for their emphasis on personal piety than for their social action. This is fortunately beginning to change. Pioneers like Jim Wallis, Tony Campolo and Ron Sider have for decades been trying to get Evangelicals to see that the Bible mandates that followers of Jesus care for those who are oppressed by injustice, and it seems their message is starting to be heard. Our job is not simply to be individually righteous. We’re supposed to conduits of social transformation.
I enthusiastically applaud this development. As I in my book The Myth of a Christian Religion, Jesus’ revolted against every aspect of society that oppressed people, and our job is to be like him. At the same time, however, I have two concerns about this development.
First, I worry that some (not all) leaders of this movement are defining Christian social activism largely in political terms. Jesus never did this. He was all about radical social action, as his life demonstrates. But he never thought it his job to get government to do the right thing or to motivate his followers to influence government in certain ways. Jesus just manifested the Kingdom in ways that impacted individuals as well as the broader culture, and he inspired others to do the same.
Second, I sometimes sense that some of those emphasizing the social dimension of the Kingdom are somewhat over-reacting against the earlier, more individualistic, understanding of Christian piety. It seems that some are myopically focusing on social action the way some earlier evangelicals myopically focused on individual piety.
In my view, the Kingdom encompasses both equally. As I see it, the main difference between Kingdom social action and secular humanitarian social action is not so much in what we do, but in why we do it. Unlike secular humanitarian social action, Kingdom social action is rooted in, and flows out of, the life-giving relationship individuals have with God through Christ. Hence the scope of our social action does not stop with providing for the physical needs of people, as good as this is, in and of itself. It goes further in seeking to transform the lives of people by inviting them into the Kingdom that Jesus unleashed into the world.
It’s not that providing for the physical needs of people is merely a means to an end, the end being verbal evangelism. Rather, evangelism includes providing for the physical needs of people. From a Kingdom perspective, these aren’t two separate things. Yet, social action only becomes a form of evangelism when it’s rooted in, and flows out of, a life-giving relationship that the individuals involved in social action have with Christ.
Kingdom social action isn’t really something Kingdom people do. Rather, it’s simply a corollary of who we are. And who we are is rooted in the fact that we are individually, and therefore collectively, becoming rightly related to God, and therefore to each other and the world, through Jesus Christ. Kingdom life, in other words, is centered on the relationship we have with God that overflows out toward others and into society.
Category: General
Tags: Evangelism, Myth of a Christian Religion, Social Issues
Related Reading

Podcast: Is it Okay to Have a Big Family?
Greg discusses families, babies, and overpopulation. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0420.mp3

Take America (& the World) Back for God?
Kai Schreiber via Compfight Recently Missio Alliance has hosted a series of posts entitled “Christianity and Violence.” Since Greg has written quite a lot on this topic from the point of view of pacifism, we thought it timely to weigh in on this topic. The following excerpt is quoted from his chapter, “Taking America Back…

In the Wilderness of Religion
Eric Bryan via Compfight There are an awful lot of us in the Church today who are no longer feeling at home in Evangelicalism. Regardless of how you feel about World Vision’s hiring policy decisions, the spectacle of thousands of people discontinuing their child sponsorships (relationships with flesh and blood children in need) because of…

Why do you have such a pessimistic view of government?
Question: I’m a Christian and serve as a servant in government and I find your book The Myth of a Christian Nation, as well as some of your sermons on Christians and politics, highly offensive. I find that while governments sometimes harm people, they also do a lot of good. The American government in particular…

Suggested Further Readings for MYTH OF A CHRISTIAN RELIGION
Here is a chapter-by-chapter list of suggested further readings for The Myth of a Christian Religion. If you’d prefer to download the readings as a Word document, click here Suggested Readings. Chapter 1. Giant Jesus Andrews, D. Christi-Anarchy: Radical Spirituality for a New Millennium (Lion, 1999). Andrews insightfully demonstrates – in his thought and…

Don’t Be a Functional Atheist at Christmas
All of us raised in Western culture have been strongly conditioned by what is called a secular worldview. The word secular comes from the Latin saeculum, meaning “the present world.” A secular worldview, therefore, is one that focuses on the present physical world and ignores or rejects the spiritual realm. To the extent that one…