We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.

7189526647_8ee484055b

Why Did God Heal or Not?

In 1996 a 27-year-old man in my church named David was diagnosed with an inoperable brain cancer. The doctors decided to send David to the Mayo Clinic to receive some experimental treatments on the slim hope these might at least prolong his life. The night before David left, I and a dozen other people went over to his house to pray. For over two hours we engaged in fervent warfare prayer on his behalf, revolting in Jesus’s name against the cancer and anything in the spirit realm that might be involved in it.

Two days later I received an elated call from David. The doctors at the Mayo Clinic could not find any trace of cancer!

Of course, the mayo clinic staff insisted that David’s local doctors must have misread his brain scans, but his local doctor said this wasn’t possible. The mystery was never resolved, which was fine with us. We just praised God that he was set free from a life-threatening infirmity that ultimately is traceable back to Satan’s oppressive regime.

But we must be honest. As impressive as this event was, it’s possible nothing supernatural occurred. Despite their insistence to the contrary, David’s doctors may have misread his brain scans, and it’s possible David’s cancer went into “spontaneous remission.” But these seem very unlikely. And since I have good reason for believing Jesus is the son of God and that his followers are supposed to be able to affect things through the power of prayer, I feel justified calling David’s healing miracle.

Now, in the interest of full disclosure, and to illustrate how arbitrary life sometimes this, I’m compelled to add the sad fact that three years after his miraculous healing, David’s brain cancer returned. And this time he wasn’t healed.

I admit that this is theologically disturbing. But I don’t think this invalidates the miracle. For all we know, Lazarus may have died three years after Jesus raised him from the dead, perhaps from the very disease that killed him the first time (John 11:146). All healings this side of heaven are temporary signs of the coming age when all forms of infirmity will be permanently overcome. Until the kingdom comes in its fullness, we will all eventually die. The very last enemy that will be overcome is death (1 Cor 15). So David’s death doesn’t undermine the genuineness of the healing.

But it does illustrate how mysterious and seemingly arbitrary life is. Why was healing prayer effective in one instance but not in another, when we were revolting against the same illness in the same person? It’s impossible to say. Yet, as I said in yesterday’s post, it’s important we understand why we can’t understand this. It’s not because God’s will or character is so mysterious. It’s rather because we live in an unfathomably complex creation.

We don’t need to blame the arbitrariness of life on God. Nor do we need to try to explain away this arbitrariness by claiming some people have sufficient faith while others don’t. We simply need to respect the impenetrable ambiguity of an unfathomably complex creation and confess, as finite human beings, that “we don’t know.”

Image by mathrock via Flickr

Related Reading

A Visit to Auschwitz

Ever since I first learned of the full horror of the Holocaust when I was a freshman at the University of Minnesota I have had a kind of obsessive fascination with it. I’ve studied every aspect of Hitler and the Third Reich and about the philosophy that led to their “Final Solution.” In fact, for…

What are the main principles of the warfare worldview?

In my book God At War (IVP, 1997) I flesh out what I call the “warfare worldview” of the Bible. This is the view that the world is a battle ground between God and good angels, on the one hand, and Satan and fallen angels, on the other. In my book Satan and the Problem…

Lighten Up: You Gotta Believe In Something, Man!

Two things here: 1) How does this philosopher not see that “not believing in believing” is itself a belief? 2) Is that a turtleneck or is that philosopher just really hairy?

Podcast: Can a Person Come Back to God if They Lose Their Faith?

Greg considers the nature of faith and unbelief and offers some enlightening insight that may surprise you.    http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0316.mp3

The Cross and Cosmic Warfare

Since the time of Anselm in the 11th century, Western theology has focused almost all of its attention on the anthropological dimension of the atonement. In the most popular understanding, the chief thing that God was accomplishing on the cross was satisfying God’s perfect justice and thereby atoning for our sins. The work of the…

Election Benediction

On this election day, when so many Americans are experiencing high levels of anxiety, I thought it would be good to share an “Election Benediction” that was written and sent to me by Kenneth Tanner. Let it ground you in the love, peace and security of Christ and his Kingdom. An Election Benediction By Kenneth…