Cruciform Theology in Four Steps
The culmination of the biblical narrative of the cross reframes everything about who God is, what it means to have faith in God, and how we read the Bible! The entire Old Testament leading up to the crucified Christ must be interpreted with a view toward discerning how it anticipates and points toward this definitive revelation. This brings us to the all-important question: How does the crucified Christ reframe the Old Testament’s disturbing portraits of God such that they bear witness to the non-violent, self-sacrificial, enemy-embracing God revealed on the cross? Let’s answer this in four steps.
Step 1: How The Cross Reveals God
The first step involves asking: How does the crucified Christ become the supreme revelation of God for us?
“The message of the cross” tells us is that in Christ, God was bearing the sin of the world to reconcile the world to himself. Thus, the cross is simultaneously supremely ugly and supremely beautiful to those who believe. The surface of this event is revoltingly ugly, for it reflects the ugly sin that Jesus bore. But to those who by faith see beyond this surface appearance, the cross also reveals the supreme beauty of a God who, out of love, was willing to bear our sin, suffer our curse, and to thereby take on this revoltingly ugly, sin-mirroring, surface appearance.
Step 2: Reading Scripture with a Cross-Informed Faith
In this step, we ask Where else might we need faith? If the cross reveals what God is truly like, it reveals what God has always been like. In this light, we should read Scripture wondering where else God might have revealed himself the way he did on the cross? Where else might we find God revealing himself by stooping to bear the sin of his people, thereby taking on an appearance that reflects the ugliness of this sin?
This is precisely how we should understand all depictions of God commanding and engaging in violence. For example, when Yahweh is depicted as vowing to not let mercy or compassion stop him from smashing families together (Jer 13:14), I submit that we are seeing a reflection of the ugly, fallen, and culturally-conditioned way Jeremiah and other ancient Israelites viewed God.
In other words, Jeremiah’s horrific depiction of God demonstrates that God’s people at this time clearly believed Yahweh was capable of smashing families together, just as the surrounding other groups of the time believed about their deities. Yet, the very fact that God allowed fallen depictions like this to be incorporated into his “God-breathed” word reveals that the humble, self-sacrificial, sin-bearing God who is fully revealed on the cross was not above stooping to meet his people where they were by bearing their sin.
Step 3: A Cross-Centered Conception of God’s “Breathing”
With this step, we ask: What does it mean for the Scriptures to be “God-breathed.” Insofar as the cross is beautiful, it reflects God acting toward us. Insofar as the cross is ugly, however, it reflects God humbly allowing other agents to act upon him. In this light, I submit that we should read our “God-breathed” Scripture with the awareness that it was “breathed” in a relational, rather than a unilateral, manner. It not only reflects God acting toward his people; it also reflects God humbly allowing the foolishness and weakness of his fallen and culturally-conditioned people to act upon him, thereby conditioning the way he appears in his written revelation.
Therefore, the degree that any portrait of God reflects the non-violent, self-sacrificial, enemy-embracing character of God that was most fully revealed on Calvary, we should conclude that it reflects God acting toward his people. But to the degree that any portrait depicts God’s character in ways that are inconsistent with the character he revealed on Calvary, we must conclude that it reflects God humbly stooping to allow his fallen people to act on him, thereby conditioning how he appears within the written revelation that he “breathed.”
Step 4: The Relational, Non-Coercive God
This final step asks: Why is God Willing To Stoop? God’s goal is to have a people who participate in and mirror his triune love in their relationship with him, with each other, and with the rest of creation. Because God sovereignly chose to create a world in which true freedom exists, he cannot override the personhood of people by controlling them. He must work with them, and through them, by means of a loving influence. This is what we should expect, given that we know that the kind of power God relies on is revealed on the cross (I Cor 1:18). Since God does not lobotomize people to get them where he wishes they were, he must be willing to humbly stoop to relate to them as they are. Which, in turn, means that God must patiently bear people’s sin as he continues to influence them in the direction he wants for them.
This is why God has always been willing stoop to allow the sin of his people—including their sinful conceptions of him—to condition how he appears whenever he “breathes” revelations of himself. His “breathing” reflects the reciprocal give-and-take of a non-coercive relationship because God is an inherently relational God and because he made us as decision-making persons who are capable of authentic relationships.
Photo credit: Endre Majoros via Visualhunt / CC BY
Greg talks about the nouns and verbs of God. Dan talks about unicorns named Gary. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0411.mp3
Greg reviewed the content of his new book, Crucifixion of the Warrior God, as a part of the Woodland Hills Church Covenant Partner gathering on March 5, 2017. If you want a fairly succinct synopsis of the thesis of his book, look no further. Ten years ago, Greg set out to write a book justifying the…
“The cross is the central way Christ images God. Christ was not an innocent third party who was punished against his will to appease the Father’s wrath. Christ is himself God, and he voluntarily took our sin and its just punishment upon himself. Hence his sacrifice does not appease God’s wrath; it reveals God’s love.…
Last week I discussed Paul’s harsh language regarding his opponents, the worst example being his reference to certain opponents as “dogs” (Phil 3:2). I suggested that such language simply reflects the fact that Paul wasn’t perfect, as he himself admitted. Several people pushed back on this suggestion by pointing out that Jesus once referred to…
Most western Christians today understand the atonement as a sort of legal-transaction that took place between the Father and the Son that got humanity “off the hook.” The legal-transaction scenario goes something like this: God’s holiness demands that all sin be punished, which in turn requires that sinners go to eternal hell. The trouble is,…
Greg considers the relationship between the testaments. Episode 548 http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0548.mp3