We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.

Was Jesus Fully God and Fully Human?
In the previous post I argued for the logical possibility of the Incarnation, so today I’d like to establish its biblical foundation. This will be review for some readers, but it’s important review because this doctrine is the absolute bedrock of the Christian faith. For example, this doctrine alone is what allows us to claim that God’s eternal nature is revealed in the unsurpassable love that was demonstrated on the cross (I Jn 3:16). If the one who died a human death on the cross was something less than God, then God is something less than unsurpassable love. What concerns me is that more and more “progressive minded” Christians are beginning to question the validity of this doctrine.
To begin, while some people in the ancient world denied it (they were called “docetists”), the New Testament is very clear that Jesus was fully human. He had to grow in wisdom (Lk 2:52) and learn obedience by going through trials, just like every other human being (Heb. 5:8). He grew hungry and tired, like the rest of us. He experienced the same range of emotions as the rest of us and was tempted in all the ways we are (4:15). He was, and is, human in every respect that we are human.
Yet, the New Testament also clearly teaches us that Jesus is God. To begin, there are a striking number of verses that explicitly call Jesus “God.” John begins his Gospel by telling us that Jesus was “the Word” who in the beginning was “with God, and who was God” (Jn 1:1). Several verses later John reiterates this point when he says that, while no one has ever seen God as he is in himself, the Word, “who is himself God, has made him known” (Jn. 1:18).
Toward the end of this Gospel, we find the risen Lord appearing to the doubting Thomas. As soon as Thomas sees him, he exclaims, “my Lord and my God” (Jn 20:28). What is most interesting about this is that, when confused people worshipped either other humans or angels, they were rebuked, for every Jew knew that only God was to be worshipped (see e.g. Ac 10:25-6; Rev.19:10). But when Jesus received these accolades from Thomas, he congratulated him for making a true statement of faith (20:21)! Similarly, in his epistle we find John referring to the Son of God as “the true God” (I Jn 5:20). And Paul refers to Jesus as “God over all” (Rom. 9:5) and “our great God and Savior” (Titus 2:13).
These explicit references should be enough to settle the matter, but the New Testament reflects the divine of Jesus in a multitude of other interesting ways a well. For starters, we find New Testament authors repeatedly ascribing to Jesus titles and activities that are elsewhere reserved for God alone. For example, the single most common title given to Jesus in the New Testament is “Lord” (kurios) (e.g. Acts 16:31, Rom 4:24, 1 Cor 15:57, Gal. 6:14). This is the Greek equivalent of Yahweh, the most sacred name for God in the Old Testament. So too, the Bible teaches that God alone is judge and creator (Eccl. 3:17, Heb 12:23), yet Jesus is depicted in these roles in the New Testament (e.g. Mt 25: 31-46; Col 1:15-19). Similarly, Yahweh alone is said to be “the alpha and the omega” and “the beginning and the end” (Isa. 41:4, 44:6, 48:12), yet Jesus says this of himself in the New Testament (Rev. 1:8, 18, 22:13).
One of the most interesting evidences of Jesus’ divinity occurs when Jesus says to his audience, “Before Abraham was, I am” (Jn. 8:58, emphasis added). The reason Jesus mixes the past and present tense is because by referring to himself as the “I am,” he’s identifying himself with Yahweh who spoke to Moses out of the burning bush saying, “ I am that I am” (Ex. 3:14). His Jewish audience understood exactly what he was claiming for himself, for they immediately picked up stones to stone him for blasphemy (Jn 8:59).
Finally, and perhaps most impressively, the Bible consistently stresses that humans are to pray to God alone. Yet, we find people engaging in prayer as well worship of Jesus throughout the New Testament (e.g. 2 Cor 12:8). In fact, Paul said he wrote his epistle of the Corinthians, “together with all those everywhere who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ—their Lord and ours” (I Cor. 1:2). In first century Jewish culture, to “call on the name” of someone, in a religious context, was another way of saying that you prayed and worship that “someone,” and it was always followed by a reference to “Yahweh.” Here Paul identifies calling on Jesus as the distinguishing mark of what all early Christians did!
In light of all this evidence, I’m convinced the only conclusion we can draw is the one the early church drew at the council of Chalcedon (451 AD); namely, that Jesus Christ is fully God and fully human. He’s not (as some teach today) simply a great teacher, an enlightened guru, an inspired prophet or an angel: He’s rather “the Word made flesh” (Jn. 1:14), the very embodiment of God.
Here’s a sermon related to this topic, if you want to hear more.
Category: Q&A
Tags: God, Incarnation, Jesus
Topics: Apologetics, Christology
Related Reading

God’s “Ways” and “Thoughts” are Higher
Isaiah 55:8-9 is one of the more often quoted passages in the Bible. It reads: … my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways … As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts (vss. 8-9). This…

Getting Honest about the Dark Side of the Bible
Eddy Van 3000 via Compfight While most of the Bible exhibits a “God-breathed” quality, reflecting a magnificently beautiful God that is consistent with God’s definitive revelation on the cross, we must honestly acknowledge that some depictions of God in Scripture are simply horrific. They are included in what is sometimes called “the dark side of…

The Cross in the Manger
There has been a strand within the Western theological tradition—one that is especially prevalent in contemporary American Evangelicalism—that construes the significance of the cross in strictly soteriological terms. The cross is central, in this view, but only in the sense that the reason Jesus came to earth was to pay the price for our sin…

Jesus and Democracy
Question: I’ve heard that the reason Jesus didn’t speak up on political issues was because he didn’t have the benefit of living in a democracy. Since we do, don’t we have a duty both to God and our country to be involved in politics? Answer: If the reason Jesus didn’t speak up on political issues…

What Does Spiritual Warfare Have To Do with the Cross?
Last week, we covered a few posts on the nature of the Atonement and the Christus Victor view. The following continues this theme, specifically looking the motif of spiritual warfare and how it relates to Christ’s work on the cross. This is an adaptation from Greg’s article in The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views. …

Q&A: Condemning Sin
Q: I have a question about how you answer the rare occasions when Jesus apparently felt it necessary to publicly condemn sin: like the cleansing of the temple and his very strong judgments on Pharisees and rulers in Matthew 23. Also John the Baptist who not only preached strongly regarding public sins but was imprisoned…