We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.
Why is America Becoming More Politically Divided?
I watched a 20/20 special the other night on politics in America. The show explored the “growing political divide” in our country. Here’s some of the information found in this program.
* Since the early 70’s Americans have become increasing polarized in their political views. Communities that once were pretty evenly split politically are now much more homogenous in their political views, whether they be liberal or conservative. For example, the show investigated several towns that were basically split 30 years ago but that have been increasingly lopsided in each of the last seven presidential elections. In the 60’s and early 70’s a good percentage of counties in the United States were “close” in terms of who they voted for. By contrast, in the last election there was only a handful of counties that were close. Some people now actually chose where they’re going to live based on how the area votes.
* As the divide has widened, the rhetoric has become uglier. Each side has tended toward extremism, and each side has a greater tendency to “demonize” their opponents. There has been less and less constructive, honest dialogue between the two sides. Americans increasingly seem to be losing the capacity to empathize with people who hold to views that differ from their own. Consequently, the politics of America is increasingly become a politics of hatred.
* “Polarizing entrepreneurs” are exploiting this divide to serve their ideological agendas. These are charismatic individuals who know how to “push the right buttons” to get people’s “political blood boiling” so people sacrifice for their cause. Though the 20/20 special didn’t investigate this point, I would add that fear is often used by these “entrepreneurs” to further their causes.
* Studies have shown that when groups composed of people from differing perspectives discuss issues, groups are generally able to develop a consensus. When groups composed of like-mind individuals dialogue, they tend to develop a consensus around more extreme positions. This sheds light on what is happening in America. People of differing perspectives are not dialoguing with one another. National consensus is no longer striven for. Rather, people in the polarized parties are only talking to like-mind people, which tends to move the parties to more extreme positions.
* The national divide not surprisingly translates into governement. In the early 70’s (I don’t remember the exact date of this study), Democrates and Republicans voted along party lines 64% of the time. In 2005, they did so 89% of the time. Senators report that when they strive for consensus with other Senators “across the floor,” their “base of support” expresses hostility. This is a further reflection of how parties tend to demonize the opposition.
* The 20/20 special showed how in the last several years “polarizing entrepreneurs” on the conservative side of the political spectrum have discovered a veritable gold mine of support in conservative Christian churches. Utilizing the internet to its full advantage, various people are rallying this base of support for their causes (e.g. the Terri Schiavo case).
I read something several weeks ago that sheds further light on the growing political divide in America. It was a neurological study of people who have strong political convictions, both on the left and the right. Measuring their brain activity, the scientists presented information that disagreed with each subject’s convictions. They discovered that this information uniformly activated the subject’s amygdala, the part of the brain that controls the “fight or flight” response, while the subject’s neo-cortex, which controls reasoning, was almost completely inactive. They then presented information that agreed with the subjects convictions. They discovered that this information uniformly activated the “pleasure centers” of the brain, with the neo-cortx again registering very little activity.
What the study shows is that we seem to be neurologically wired to be narrow minded! We have great difficulty thinking objectively – rationally – about matters that concern us. When we confront facts that disagree with what we already believe, we experience anger and our reasoning center tends to shut down. And when we confront facts that agree with what we already believe, we experience pleasure and our reasoning center again tends to shut down.
How does this relate to the 20/20 special? It suggests that we Americans as a whole are increasingly less rational and more emotional about political issues. It suggests that, at least on political matters, we are increasingly becoming a nation of animals who are controlled by external stimuli, rather than a nation of people who think deeply about issues. It suggests that we are allowing ourselves to be controlled by “polarizing entrepreneurs” who (whether consciously or not) know how to activate our amygdala and pleasure centers while shutting down our reasoning skills. We are, in short, being increasingly controlled. We are becoming puppets who feel passionately, but think little.
And, of course, there are spiritual powers behind this ugly affair. They are exploiting our wiring to create a nation that is divided.
What should kingdom people learn from all this? Knowing that our kingdom is not of this world, we ought to be among those rare individuals who have a capacity to remain aware of our neurological conditioning and refuse to give either our amygdala or our pleasure centers ultimate authority over our life. Since we know that the ultimate hope of the world lies in Jesus Christ and not in some political party, we ought to be able to remain “one step removed” from all the hate rhetoric and cultivate a capacity to genuinely empathize with those who disagree with our political opinions. And knowing that our battle is “not against flesh and blood” but against principalities and powers (Eph. 6:12) we must refuse to become puppets of any who would try to get us to demonize others and refuse to buy into the hate rhetoric. We know that ultimately, people are not the enemy but are themselves victims of the enemy.
Our calling is not to have all the “right” answers to the world’s political problems. Our call is to love and serve all people, regardless of what their political stances might be. “Live in love, as Christ loved you and gave his life for you” (Eph. 5:1-2).
Category: General
Tags: Kingdom Living, Politics
Topics: Ethical, Cultural and Political Issues
Related Reading
Take America (& the World) Back for God?
Kai Schreiber via Compfight Recently Missio Alliance has hosted a series of posts entitled “Christianity and Violence.” Since Greg has written quite a lot on this topic from the point of view of pacifism, we thought it timely to weigh in on this topic. The following excerpt is quoted from his chapter, “Taking America Back…
12 Reasons for Keeping the Kingdom of God Separate from Politics, Part 2
Image by the justified sinner via Flickr Satan is the “god of this age” (2 Cor 4:4) and “ruler of the world (Jn 12:30; 14:31) who “controls the entire world” (1 Jn 5;19) and possesses all the power of “all the kingdoms of the world” (Lk 4:6). While governments are ordained by God to preserve…
“For many…the American flag has smothered the glory of the cross, and the ugliness of our American version of Caesar has squelched the radiant love of Christ.” [Quotes]
“This myth harms the church’s primary mission. For many in America and around the world, the American flag has smothered the glory of the cross, and the ugliness of our American version of Caesar has squelched the radiant love of Christ. Because the myth that America is a Christian nation has led many to associate America…
The Wrong “Bulls-Eye”: Reflections on the “Christian Left”
As it has since the fourth century, the Church today for the most part operates with a Constantinian (“power-over”) paradigm. Because of this, most socially concerned Christians are inclined to define the Church’s mission as adjudicating between and tweaking political options “in Jesus’ name.” We accept Caesar’s definition of “power” as the ability to get…
The Image of Cross-Like Love: God’s Self-Portrait, Part 6
In the previous blog I argued that God is cross-like love. In this blog I’d like to take this a step further by demonstrating why the cross alone could function as the definitive revelation of God’s true character and by showing how this revelation weaves together everything Jesus was about. If you want to know…
The Politics of Demonization
Jonathan Martin posted a blog this week that we wanted to share called the politics of demonization (demonic talk on immigration, & other things). Have you noticed the hateful ways that we characterize the “other” in public discourse? Jonathan suspects (and we agree) that there’s a powerful force driving this tendency in all of us. As he puts it…