We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded solely by your direct support. Please consider supporting this project.

The Center of the Bible
Over the past few posts, we’ve been discussing various aspects of the Bible’s authority. We talked about the God-breathed nature of the book, reasons why we can trust it, and about what to do with aspects that look erroneous. In this post, let’s consider the point of the Scriptures.
When we miss this central purpose of the Bible, that’s when we misunderstand what’s being said.
Jesus chastised many religious people of his day who knew their Bible well but did not accept him as the full disclosure of God and thus the centerpiece of Scripture. “You search the scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life,” he said. But “it is they that testify on my behalf” (Jn 5:39). Hence Jesus rebuked them because they refused to “come to [him] to have life” (Jn 5:40). The purpose of Scripture, Jesus was teaching, is to bring people to him. The words of Scripture do not have eternal life in and of themselves. They are vehicles to bring people to eternal life only insofar as they point people to the One who is eternal life. Indeed, Jesus went on to tell these people that they did not truly believe in Scripture unless they believed in him. “If you believed Moses you would believe me, for he wrote about me” (Jn 5:46).
A similar point is driven home by the author of Hebrews when he writes:
Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds. He is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact imprint of God’s very being, and he sustains all things by his powerful word (Heb 1:1-3).
All previous revelations, mediated through words, were merely anticipations of the revelation of God mediated through his own Son “in these last days.” The revelation of God in his Son is the pinnacle of God’s revelation throughout history. He surpasses all previous revelations in that he alone is the perfect reflection of God’s glory and exact imprint of God’s very being. He is the one true God directly revealed as his one true Word. As in John, the author of Hebrews connects the unsurpassable revelatory nature of the Son to the fact that he is the Creator and sustainer of the world as well as the one for whom the creation exists. He is the source of all things and “heir of all things.” In Jesus, all of creation finds its ultimate explanation and fulfillment.
Hence, we must never think of the revelation of God in Christ as merely part of God’s total revelation, as though (say) the book of Leviticus possessed the same revelatory authority as Jesus.
Rather, everything before Christ must be read in the light of Christ. All previous revelations are authoritative for the post-Christ believer insofar as they anticipate and point to God’s definitive revelation in Christ.
In contrast to all previous revelations, Jesus is the full revelation of God’s wisdom, a wisdom that had been hidden throughout the ages (I Cor 1:24; 2:7; Eph 3:9-11; Col 2:3). Moreover, in sharp contrast to all previous revelations, in Christ the “whole fullness of deity dwells bodily” (Col 2:9, cf. 1:19). All that makes God God — the whole fullness of his deity — took on bodily form in Christ. All previous revelations of God were partial, but in Christ God is revealed fully. All previous revelations were mediated through writing, but in Christ God is revealed in bodily form. Hence, the point of the Scriptures is to see God’s Son as he is the climactic revelation of Scripture. In this light, Christ interprets all previous revelations, as he is the key to unlocking the meaning of Scripture. If we understand this about the Bible, we will read it according to the purpose for which it was written.
Photo credit: Lawrence OP via VisualHunt / CC BY-NC-ND
Category: General
Tags: Bible, Biblical Authority
Topics: Biblical Reliability
Related Reading

The Bible is Infallible NOT Inerrant
While the cruciform understanding (explained here) of the “God-breathed” nature of Scripture is in tension with the way most talk about inerrancy (See previous post on inerrancy), I do not believe it is at all incompatible with what the Church has always sought to express by affirming the “infallibility” the Scripture. The core conviction is that Scripture will…

Jesus is the Center of the Story
The previous post addressed how the revelation of Christ is the surprising twist that reframes how we must read all that precedes it. Today we’ll look briefly at five supports to this claim. Jesus said, “I have a testimony greater than that of John” (John 5:36). Jesus elsewhere claims that “among those born of women…

A Review of a Review of Benefit of the Doubt
I’d like to offer a brief response to a curious on-line review of Benefit of the Doubt, published on thechristians.com. It’s titled, Which came first, Jesus or the Bible? A clever heretic draws a false division between God and Scripture. That “clever heretic” would be yours truly, and I allegedly draw this false division in…

A Coming Storm
There is a storm beginning to brew on the horizon. It is a debate among Evangelicals about the violent depictions of God, stirred up largely by Eric Seibert’s Disturbing Divine Behavior. Here is a post that sounds “the clarion call.” The debate is presently around two options. Option #1: Traditionalists argue we must simply embrace…

Are the Gospels Historical Fiction?
Some scholars today argue that the stories recorded in the Gospels are actually intentional fabrication. In essence, they argue that Mark took Paul’s theology and robed the story of Jesus in a fictitious historical narrative. The other Gospels followed suit. The argument is clever and removes the difficulty of explaining how a legend of a…

If the violent depictions of God in the Bible are not completely accurate, isn’t all of Scripture up for debate?
Question: I’m very intrigued by your cruciform hermeneutics and can’t wait for your book (Crucifixion of the Warrior God) to come out. But I have to say that it strikes me as dangerous. You’re basically saying that the violent portraits of God in the OT are not completely accurate. But doesn’t this place us flawed…