sin

What is “Original Sin”?

I get asked about “original sin” quite a bit. Are people born guilty? Many times questions like this originate from folks who are worried about whether babies who die without being baptized go to hell. This is what I was taught as a young Catholic boy, and I have to confess I now find the concept to be as morally offensive as it is unbiblical.

It’s true that we’re born into spiritual slavery and into a corrupted creation. Our physical, mental and spiritual make up is, in varying degrees, damaged from the start. And there’s no doubt that this renders it inevitable that we will in time join the rebellion by sinning. But there’s absolutely no support for the bizarre idea that babies are in some sense guilty and in danger of hell before they ever sin!

If we want to talk about “original sin” in a biblical way, we need to go back to the time when humans were first co-opted into the rebellion. In Genesis 3 we find that the “original sin” was eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This is the sin of trying to acquire life—that is our identity, worth, significance and security—on our own, and of trying to know what only God can know. It’s the sin of mistrusting God and thinking we can define “good” and “evil” for ourselves. It’s the sin of playing God by judging.

This sin is the “original sin” not just in the sense of being first, but also in the sense of being foundational to all other sin. Whenever we rebel against God, the only true source of life, and try to derive life from non-divine sources, we involve ourselves in judgment. We set ourselves up as the arbiters and definers of “good” and “evil” and critically assess God, ourselves, others, and everything else through this judging filter. Living in perpetual hunger, we view everything in terms of its potential as idolatrous food. Basically, things are “good” when they enhance our sense of worth, significance, and security, and things are “evil” when they threaten our sense of worth, significance, and security.

The most common manifestation of original sin is the way we contrast ourselves with others. In a pathetic attempt to ascribe worth, significance, and security to ourselves, we arbitrarily devise criteria that, to our own minds at least, reveal that our family, tribe, class, race, culture, religion, political ideology, or nation are better than others. Instead of ascribing worth to others at cost to ourselves, which is our primary job as humans made in the image of the servant God, we ascribe worth to ourselves at the expense of others.

This is the “original sin,” for this kind of judgment is antithetical to, and the main inhibitor of, love. Not only this, but because “original sin” transforms individuality, tribes, classes, races, cultures, religions, political ideologies and nations into idolatrous sources of life while setting them in competition with one another, judgment lies at the root of all violence. The Accuser makes us accusers of God, ourselves, and each other and delights in the monotonous bloodbath that ensues.

The good news is that, by absorbing the full wrath of the Accuser’s judgment on Calvary, Jesus in principle disempowered judgment (Col 2:14-16). Jesus thereby reconnects us with our true source of life, satisfies the hunger in our innermost being, and frees us from our addiction to the forbidden tree. In this way, he empowers us to love God, ourselves, and others with the same unconditional love God has for us.

Photo credit: Internet Archive Book Images via VisualHunt.com

Related Reading

Podcast: What Will Keep Us from Falling Away in Heaven?

Greg talks heaven and hell in this solid little episode. http://traffic.libsyn.com/askgregboyd/Episode_0393.mp3 Painting: Fallen Angel By: Odilon Redon Date: 1872

The Problem with Naming People’s Sin

Jesus told a woman caught in adultery: “Go and sin no more” (John 8:11). Since Jesus said this, does this give the church the right to tell people not to sin? It’s one thing for Jesus, who “knew no sin” to say this and quite another for people like us—with tree trunks protruding out of…

Tags: ,
Topics:

Penal Substitution View of Atonement: Did God the Father Just Need to Vent?

In this video blog, Greg outlines the penal substitution view of atonement which says that the Father poured out his wrath on Jesus instead of us so that we could be forgiven. This view is very common and you might even be nodding your head in agreement with that description. However, this view creates some…

Lighten Up: Sin

Might as well confess.

Why did God create me to be a pedophile?

Question: Since the first time I experienced a sex drive it’s been directed towards little children. I’ve never acted on this, for I know it’s wrong. But it torments me. Why would God created me with pedophile cravings? Answer: I’m so sorry for your condition and greatly respect the fact that you have committed yourself…

Faith or Magic?

Many Christians today treat faith like magic. While the content of what Christians believe is obviously different from pagan practitioners of magic, the way they believe and the motive they have for believing, seems to be very similar. Magic is generally understood to involve people engaging in special behaviors that empower them to gain favor…