We run our website the way we wished the whole internet worked: we provide high quality original content with no ads. We are funded by your direct support for ReKnew and our vision. Please consider supporting this project.
Jesus was Not a [Socialist]
Article by Dan Kent
Our political climate right now exhausts me. The fracturing. The bullying. The ideological mobs. I feel like I’m surrounded by a hundred Towers of Babel babbling at me all day long, pummeling me with endless propaganda and page-after-page of facts. “Look at the facts!” they implore. They want me in their tower, on their team, in their mob.
I’ve grown a thick skin to most of the noise, but when they claim Jesus as a member of their mob, well, I get worked up. Every tower seems to think they have Jesus inside. Do a Google search for “Jesus is a…” and you’ll discover that Jesus was a libertarian, a communist, a republican, a democrat, an anarchist, a baseball fan—I even found a picture of a KKK rally in Portland celebrating Jesus!
Give me an argument for your political perspective, and I’ll listen. But as soon as you say “Jesus was a [BLANK],” you lose me. “You have one teacher, the Messiah,” Jesus said, establishing himself as a source of truth that surpasses all towers (Matthew 23:10). Portraying Jesus as a member of our political tower subverts Jesus’ authority and demotes Jesus to a student of our little ideology.
Please consider abandoning all efforts to establish Jesus as an ambassador for your political view. Stop taking Jesus hostage in your tower! Besides being hopelessly unpersuasive (everybody believes Jesus resides in their own tower), the tactic misrepresents Jesus’ teaching in a profound and dangerous way.
Socialism boasts ideals that look very similar to things Jesus teaches. Like socialism, Jesus cared about feeding the poor, and had warnings for the rich (see Luke 6:20-25). Socialism, or democratic socialism, seeks to eliminate economic poverty and to constrain wealth, and so it looks very much like what Jesus taught. But the similarity is an illusion. Socialism seeks to realize its vision through government. Jesus seeks to accomplish his vision through discipleship. Government and discipleship are deeply contrary to one another.
(1) Government controls from the outside-in, discipleship transforms from the inside-out.
Government gets what it wants through external pressure: laws, punishments, incentives, and things like that. Discipleship triggers an internal transformation that compels us to willingly live the way Jesus calls us to live.
Jesus cares about one’s economic condition, for sure. But he cares about the condition of one’s heart even more. A heart overflowing with agape love will share freely with brothers and sisters, without external pressure. Only whole and secure hearts can maintain meaningful economic equality. Trying to secure and maintain economic equality from the outside-in will only lead to contention, resistance, and violence, as history has shown many times over.
If Jesus wanted economic equality above all else, like socialism does, he could have accomplished that with ease. He could have exerted his divine authority in the political realm and established an unstoppable democratic socialism that would have perfectly balanced the economics of every earthly society. This fact grounded Satan’s greatest temptation: control over all the kingdoms of the earth (Matthew 4:8-9), but Jesus rejected this path.
He never pressured anyone from the outside-in to liquidate their assets. Jesus was not Robin Hood. He did not redistribute anyone’s wealth. He appealed to each person’s heart and, if they were ready to answer that appeal, he celebrated them (Luke 19:8-10). If they were not ready, he let them be what they were (Luke 18:18-25). He never settled for political shortcuts to spiritual problems.
Government is all about managing people and resources. Anytime you have a group of people, things need to be managed. So we must have government. But we do not have to devote ourselves to government—or a political ideology for that matter. When you step back a little, you see that every political ideology, like democratic socialism, is simply a philosophy of managing people and resources.
But Discipleship is all about becoming the types of people who do not need to be managed. People who share what they have, love their neighbors, serve the stranger, and help the disadvantaged don’t need to be managed. But these are exactly the types of behaviors you can’t force through government management. They only emerge from the power of discipleship, submitted under Jesus, who alone justifies the crazy, imprudent, self-sacrifice that meaningful equality requires.
Socialist government strives for economic equality and must eventually wrestle for economic compliance with force. They must conquer the unwilling with power. Jesus confronts us with a teaching and a reality that transforms us from the inside-out, shaping our hearts into powerful forces of charity and agape-willingness, from our own hearts and on our own terms.
(2) Government focuses on ends, discipleship focuses on means.
In government, the ends often justify the means. It doesn’t often matter what you say or do to people as long as you get the results you want. “It’s just politics,” we say. You find this mentality in any political group, even socialists, whose intentions seem so good. In fact, since they are so nobly fighting for the poor, the inclination to shrewd and cut-throat behavior might be even greater, as the perceived righteousness of their ends can justify, in their own minds, greater compromise in their deeds.
But in discipleship the ends do not justify the means. To the contrary, how we treat people is the whole show! The means are everything. It doesn’t matter if we get what we want if we treat people in ways that are not Christ-like.
This is not to say that as a disciple we must stay away from politics. My point is that we can only devote ourselves to one or the other, because they are so deeply contrary to one another and they both seek to shape us into their image. I like to think of it this way: The better a person gets at sumo wrestling the less effective they will be at competitive swimming. You can only excel at one.
Ideological towers surround us and lobby us to join their force. They want us to brand ourselves with their branding. They want us to consider ourselves one of them, to submit our identity to theirs, to declare to the world “I am a [whatever]!” But disciples of Jesus are ambassadors for Jesus only, so we can lovingly reject all branding. We are Towerless Apostles, submitted and devoted to one Teacher, secured in God’s love. We can listen to the propaganda, we can have opinions, but our trust is in our Teacher, who transforms us in deep places, then calls us out into the world to revolutionize humanity, one person at a time, from the inside-out.
See Part Two HERE.
Category: Guest Contributor
Tags: Discipleship, Political Idolatry, Politics
Topics: Ethical, Cultural and Political Issues
Daniel Kent has authored several books, including Confident Humility: Becoming Your Full Self Without Becoming Full of Yourself, and the series The Training of KX12. He also produces and hosts ReKnew’s Podcast Greg Boyd: Apologies & Explanations and serves as editor-in-chief here at ReKnew.org.
In your Anabaptist view, should Christians get involved in politics at all? Do you think they should even vote?
Ultimately, each person must follow their conscience when it comes to whether or not they vote, how they vote if they decide to vote, and the extent to which they should involve themselves in the political system. But we must always remain aware of the dangers involved in participating in the political system, for it…
Q&A: When Confronting Unambiguous Evil
Q: I read your post on Abortion. I found it compelling and am considering moving toward that kind of a position on the matter. I am also reading “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” for the first time and wonder if Boyd’s response to slavery (were it currently an issue as abortion is today) would be a similar approach…
A Kingdom Not of This World
Bruxy Cavey spoke at Woodland Hills Church back in May as a part of the Tapestry series, and this is a little snippet of his sermon. It’s a wonderful description of the Anabaptist approach to politics. Take a look!
Don’t Wilberforce’s achievements refute your stance on the separation of faith and politics?
Question: William Wilberforce was a Christian whose passionate involvement in politics almost single-handedly brought an end to the slave trade in 19th century England. Don’t his achievements show the importance of Christians being involved in politics, thus refuting your contention that Christian’s should keep their faith and values separate from politics? Answer: First, while I…
Christians and Politics: What are the different views?
How involved should Christians be in secular politics? Throughout history, Christians have embraced a number of different perspectives on this issue. These perspectives can basically be broken down into three groups. First, some Christians believe that one of the church’s jobs is to transform and ultimately control politics. This view has often been labeled the…
Are You Anti-American?
Greg answers the frequently asked question of whether he is anti-American. What’s your best guess? Watch the video and find out!